measured with two different things. few days ago, was in Iran a Prozess in Gang gesetzt, an dessen Ende die Destabilisierung des Landes stehen kann, in dem die einzige vom Volk angestrebte und durchgeführte Revolution des 20.Jahrhunderts stattfand. Es ist mutig, dies zu heute zu schreiben, aber ebenso ist es feige es nicht zu tun. Bleiben wir objektive Menschen, wenn es um Geschichte und Politik geht.
Der mediale Fokus lag in den vergangenen Wochen auf den Präsidentschaftswahlen in Iran, wie nie zuvor. Kaum verwunderlich, denn weite Teile der Welt wünschten sich die Abwahl des Amtsinhabers Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad. Es sah, wenn man dem von den Medien vermittelten Stimmungsbild Glauben schenken wollte, gut aus. Der Mitbewerber Mir Hossein Mussawi war von 1981 bis 1989 Premierminister der islamischen Republik and appeared after his retirement from politics, to have changed for the hard-line reform-minded conservatives. The Participation Front of Islamic Iran - the bastion of the reformers - was made a recommendation to vote in favor Mousavi.
There is a stigma of people and the media that they support the lesser evil often without reservation with a zeal reminiscent of religiosity. Mousavi, as the Iranian Barack Obama? Only has the Iranian candidate, posing as a lawyer for the masses, not just those mass united behind him. Neither he nor his supporters can believe that. Democracy is unpredictable and not a religious issue - thankfully.
62.6 percent of Iranians Ahmadinejad has confirmed in office. 33.7 percent chose Mousavi and only 3% voted for the candidate Mehdi Karroubi and Mohsen Rezai. The whole with a turnout of almost 85%. On European democracy suffer annoyance, the Iranians did not. But these figures are contested. Both by Western media, the Iranian opposition - which is now composed of Moussaoui and his followers - and by the declared enemies of the Iranian president. Say it once casually: I would do the same! losing an election is bad, if one is already in advance as a winner and "liberators" sees. The "green movement" has failed in the democratic process and is now a huff.
It reflects deeply undemocratic behavior when elections are called as falsified and manipulated without exposing flagrant violations of the law, and put forward evidence of their own hypotheses. That those who demonize the past four years, the suspected rogue Ahmadinejad, will now adorn Mousavi and trellis path with rose petals, is a logical side effect. The candidate and his supporters have to explain what was different in 2009 than in 2005. You need to call their supporters to remain calm and make their claims after the interests of the whole country. Everything else would have dire consequences for Iran and the entire region.
Should there be an interest in the U.S. and its allies to provide for a revolution in Iran, then now is the time the practice has come. You can be sure that it matches the Pentagon plan was, and some politicians and much of the money aristocracy now rubbing their hands. For many months, Iran is partly right and partly wrong in the crosshairs of the international community. It is clear that we tolerate as a liberal man can not know if the president of Iran is the Holocaust in question, but this does not imply that he was unelectable for the Iranian people and had to win Mousavi. A consensus of the people of Iran: No foreign destination, never again! The "green movement" will not step into the time before 1979. Ahmadinejad and the Shah signals, however, the U.S. is not everybody's darling and you will not at any cost Coca Cola and Ralph Lauren. It was clear: A military operation against Iran would be a disaster. The people would not let itself be clamped - Iran is not just Iraq.
The current development provides opportunities for completely new ones. So-called "Covert Operations" in the wake of civil unrest, which can be fired by external influence. Whether export Iranian exiles from the camp or the Pahlavi Volksmudschedin, Sunni opponents of the strongest players in the region or countries of the Western canon of values \u200b\u200bwithout compromise do - the list of those who breathe these days political morning air, can be continued.
The consequences of a destabilization of Iran, are not predictable. Hypotheses to represent not constructive. But "Stop crying, if the truth in the name of a false freedom dies, is a civic duty. Once in newspapers and magazines, suggests, was to demonstrate that today people in Iran who are brutally repressed for 30 years, the truth is dead. There was no military coup in 1979, not regime change, and no civil war. It was a relatively peaceful revolution of the street - this has to concede to the country. Furthermore, the Company in thirty years, more and more liberalized. From their own efforts out a popularly desired Republic has grown up. Yesterday, according to media reports in Tehran, tens of thousands of supporters celebrated the victory of the new and old president, while various sources of just writing a few hundred opposition activists who want to impose by force their "reforms". Let us hope that this understanding of Demokraie, will never, nowhere tolerated.
